5 Essential Elements For case law for cancelation of hiba in pakistan
5 Essential Elements For case law for cancelation of hiba in pakistan
Blog Article
77 . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 in the Constitution based over the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued on the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement within the FIR lodged by FIA and inside the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative with the legislation laid down by the Supreme Court inside the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Therefore, the competent authority of your parent department of the petitioner and also the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount of your petitioner and pay back the pension amount and other ancillary benefits to the petitioner to which he is entitled under the law within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority with the respondent is additionally directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits with the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more
When the state court hearing the case reviews the law, he finds that, although it mentions large multi-tenant properties in some context, it is actually pretty obscure about whether the ninety-day provision relates to all landlords. The judge, based on the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held to the ninety-working day notice need, and rules in Stacy’s favor.
competent authority and when any appeal or representation is filed the same shall be decided(Promotion)
Previous four tax years interpreted. It's not from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more
The recent amendment to Section 489-File on read more the Pakistan Penal Code signifies a progressive step towards effectively combatting counterfeiting activities. Through its expanded scope, heightened penalties, and technological considerations, the amendment aligns the law with contemporary challenges.
The ruling with the first court created case law that must be followed by other courts until eventually or unless both new legislation is created, or maybe a higher court rules differently.
The Court regarded as the case to generally be maintainable under Article 184 (three) Because the danger and encroachment alleged were for instance to violate the constitutional right to life when interpreted expansively.
nine. Needless to mention that any observations made in the above mentioned order are tentative in nature and shall not influence the trial Court.
In simple terms, the section states that any person who commits intentional murder shall be subjected into the death penalty or life imprisonment, along with a potential fine.
In certain jurisdictions, case regulation can be applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family law.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
13309-B of 2010 to get weak types of evidence along with the evidentiary value whereof would be witnessed with the time in the trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, Therefore, confirmed custody in the petitioner in jail is not likely to provide any valuable purpose at this stage.”
P.C. for grant of post arrest bail should also be dismissed. Suffice is to watch that that considerations for pre- arrest and post-arrest bail are thoroughly different. Reliance in this regard is placed on case regulation titled as “Shah Nawaz v. The State” 2005 SCMR 1899” wherein it's been held from the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:--